Showing posts with label American Revolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American Revolution. Show all posts

Friday, August 28, 2009

a taste of Paine

Who was Paine? Depending on whom you ask, he was ­either an uncompromising free-thinker who made possible the popular embrace of the ­Declaration of Independence, or "a filthy little atheist," as Teddy Roosevelt once ­described him. A seditious subject of the English crown or an honorary French citizen chucked in the Bastille. Or just a fiercely American idealist with too much interest in brandy and democracy and not enough in fashion or personal hygiene.

The painting, a bust circa 1792 by Laurent Dabos of Toulouse, seems to have been lost until only a few years ago, when it surfaced in England. It's a flattering portrait, but—not surprisingly, perhaps—on the back of the canvas an anonymous hand appears to have scribbled something of an insult to Paine.

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Revolutionary Scamp

The drillmaster of Valley Forge.





The Granger Collection, New York

German soldier of fortune and American ally Baron von Steuben (1730-94)

Monday, November 3, 2008

Revolution Is No Tea Party

Jonathan Karl, of ABC News, reviews a biography: Samuel Adams: A Life, by Ira Stoll (Free Press, 338 pages, $28).

he was perhaps the most forceful single figure behind the American Revolution. He was also America's first great political operative, mastering the arts of spin and strategy in ways that future generations of David Axelrods and Lee Atwaters could profitably emulate. Ira Stoll, in his pithy and well-researched biography, sets out to rescue Adams from historical obscurity.

flagitious: extremely wicked, deeply criminal
condign: fitting or appropriate and deserved; used especially of punishment

The book makes it abundantly clear why the British so detested Adams. He started talking independence more than a decade before the Declaration and did more than anyone to organize opposition to colonial taxes and to make "no taxation without representation" a rallying cry.

The original spinmeister. An incident on March 5, 1770, which led to shots being fired, resulted in 11 colonists shot, 5 fatally.

The facts surrounding the incident are still in dispute, but, writes Mr. Stoll, "what is certain is that Adams pressed immediately and aggressively to wring every possible bit of political advantage from the bloodshed." He started by giving it a name: the Boston Massacre.

Sam engaged in agitprop, writing 20,000 words on the subject in Boston newspapers. Juries acquitted six soldiers, and found two guilty of merely manslaughter. Sam was incensed. One can only imagine what he thought of his cousin John, who defended the British soldiers in court.

Family gatherings must have been tense. A curious twist, considering John would become president, and Sam would be relegated to oblivion.

Adams's next major move was to instigate what turned out to be the Boston Tea Party, a protest against yet another British tax. Adams publicized the episode in a way that would, once again, maximize support for the cause of independence. He pointed out – in public letters and newspaper columns – that the ships themselves were not harmed, only the tea; in a bit of revolutionary spin, he blamed the whole thing on the unyielding royal governor.

That's spin control.

If Mr. Stoll's biography lacks the narrative power of books on other Founders, such as David McCullough's "John Adams," the reason may be that the paper trail left by Samuel Adams is frustratingly short. He destroyed much of his correspondence during the revolutionary years, fearful that it could fall into the wrong hands. Some of the letters that remain end with the words "burn this." This Adams wasn't playing for the history books. He was trying to plot a revolution. Mr. Stoll makes a convincing case that Samuel Adams is not just the most underrated of the Founders but also one of the most admirable, down-to-earth and principled (he worked to abolish slavery).

A Republican, not a Federalist (as was John), he was 81 when Jefferson became president. TJ certainly thought highly of Sam.

"I often asked myself, is this exactly in the spirit of the patriarch of liberty, Samuel Adams? Is it as he would express it? Will he approve of it?" Jefferson lamented that the 81-year-old Adams could not serve in his administration, but, he wrote, "give us your counsel my friend, and give us your blessing." Adams died two years later.

If Mr. Stoll's biography lacks the narrative power of books on other Founders, such as David McCullough's "John Adams," the reason may be that the paper trail left by Samuel Adams is frustratingly short. He destroyed much of his correspondence during the revolutionary years, fearful that it could fall into the wrong hands. Some of the letters that remain end with the words "burn this." This Adams wasn't playing for the history books. He was trying to plot a revolution. Mr. Stoll makes a convincing case that Samuel Adams is not just the most underrated of the Founders but also one of the most admirable, down-to-earth and principled (he worked to abolish slavery).

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

A Library encounter

This is the manna of librarianship. A man came in and told me he would "like to donate to the library a copy of the book I just wrote." It's entitled "Revolutionary War - Battle of Brooklyn: The Battle of Long Island". I asked him to sign it, and, in a shaky hand, he did: Sam W. Galowitz. It is 202 pages, including maps, appendices, and tables. It pains me, a trained indexer, to say that it has no index.

He was back in a couple of minutes to tell me he is currently working on a book about Richard Hewlett. A Tory sympathizer and gun-runner, he was one of the men most wanted for capture (he was to be given no quarter, Mr. Galowitz told me) by the Revolutionary forces. Yes, his family lived in this area which is now Hewlett. One of his descendants has the local high school named after him, G.W. Hewlett. We agreed it would be rich irony if the GW stands for George Washington, as is, of course possible, given his ancestors political sympathies.

I asked him if he knew of the American Revolution Round Table; he did not. I told him it meets at the Williams Club, once every other month. He knew of the Williams Club, and recognized the name Tom Fleming.

We talked a bit about Hewlett, just two history buffs chatting. What fun.